IAMTOM.ORG

month

September 2008

45 posts

BT Internet Customers Read This

Today, BT will start trials of Webwise, a technology which analyses your web surfing habits in order to serve you targetted ads. If you’re a BT Total Broadband customer, you might be asked to consent to being part of this trial. Here are four good reasons not to.

  1. You gain nothing. BT is looking to profit from its deployment of behavioural targetted advertising technology, but you stand to gain very little. Unless the offer of “more relevant advertising” is something that holds a special promise for you, what you are getting in return for allowing BT to analyse your web surfing habits is an “anti-fraud” feature which is unlikely to give you anything more than the features already built into web browsers Internet Explorer 7 (available for free upgrade to existing Internet Explorer users) or Firefox 3 (also free) - or Opera (thanks for the tip, Glyn!).
  2. BT has already trialled Webwise on its customers - without telling you. BT are only asking for your consent now because the authorities that regulate data protection have told it it has to. BT already trialled Webwise - without asking your permission - in 2006 and 2007. That doesn’t sound like a company you should trust to protect you and your family’s privacy.
  3. BT are making you responsible for getting everyone who uses your computer to consent to being profiled by Webwise. The Government have told BT that in order for Webwise to conform to UK data protection laws, BT must seek the consent of everyone who uses an internet connection where Webwise is enabled. To get around this, BT have devised new terms and conditions for people who agree to trial Webwise that transfer this burden onto you.
  4. BT Webwise turns the web inside out. Competitiveness, universal access, and the transformative effects of the world wide web are all underpinned by the internet’s structure as a so-called “network of ends”, and by internet service providers, like BT, adopting the role of a “mere conduit” of information. By intercepting communications between you and the websites you visit and using this information to target advertising at you, BT is compromising that role - becoming more like a television broadcaster than an internet service provider.

Concerned digital rights campaigners have fought a long and hard battle over Phorm, the technology used in BT Webwise. During this battle, it has become clear that there is no protection for UK citizens from corporations who wish to illegally intercept private communications for financial gain. Today it might look like campaigners have lost the battle against Phorm, but without their hard work, BT may not have been forced to ask your permission to take part in this trial at all - it could have simply assumed it.

If you’d like to find out more about how Phorm works, read this technical overview. If you would like to know more about the legal ramifications of Phorm, read this legal analysis. If you would like to get active, visit dephormation.org.uk and nodpi.org.

(From the ORG blog)

Sep 30, 20080 notes
A Continuous Lean. → acontinuouslean.com
Sep 29, 20080 notes

at the doctors getting new inhalers. Its weird the waiting room is full and not one person looks ill

Sep 29, 20080 notes
Five Best Sites to Stream TV [Hive Five] → feeds.gawker.com
Sep 29, 20080 notes
Re:Lit | Library | The Publishing Branch of the Resurgence → relit.org
Sep 29, 20080 notes
Re:Lit | Library | The Publishing Branch of the Resurgence → relit.org
Sep 29, 20080 notes

my prodigal phone is back!

Sep 27, 20080 notes
Debate verdicts

Marbury says:

It’s really too early to say what happened. Big debates like last night’s need time to be digested, discussed and chewed over by people around the country before their impact can be assessed. And of course, both campaigns are mounting furious spin operations to shape the prevailing media narratives (I expect Schmidt and his team will be better at this than Axelrod/Gibbs). But amongst the instant reactions the consensus appears to be a draw or something close to it, with commentators split on who won a narrow victory. Some examples:

A Tie

John Dickerson (though he says McCain’s performance was stronger)

Chuck Todd

Marc Ambinder

McCain Won

John Harris

Mickey Kaus

Obama Won

Nate Silver (particularly interesting on why many of the pundits might be calling this wrongly)

Joe Klein

They Both Lost

Eve Fairbanks

Watch the full debate here
Three-minute version here

Sep 27, 2008-1 notes

yey! Sermon done. Off to town to do jobs.

Sep 27, 20080 notes

speaking went well this week. Just Sunday morning to go! Tired tho so off to bed.

Sep 26, 20080 notes
The Police named richest rockers of 2008 → nme.com
Sep 26, 20080 notes
Wired.com Photo Contest: Fall → wired.com

The air is turning cold and crisp and the sun is becoming a recluse, which herald the subject of our next photo contest: Fall

Sep 26, 20080 notes
Sep 26, 2008-1 notes
my current blogroll (by Marko) → ysmarko.com
Sep 25, 20080 notes

still writing - at the moment trying to solve the problem of Gods sovereignty vs human agency - shoyldnt take more than 10/15mins!

Sep 25, 2008-1 notes
Strangely compelling slow mo → edge.famecast.com
Sep 25, 2008-1 notes

on hold with vodafone trying to sort a very simply issue. still its taking like 40mins :(

Sep 24, 20080 notes

right talk 2/3 to finish. gentlemen start your engines!

Sep 24, 20080 notes
Play
Sep 24, 20080 notes
Organic Vegetables Scotland – Home delivery, Veg boxes – Vital Veg → vitalveg.co.uk
Sep 23, 2008-1 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 29
  • February 27
  • March 17
  • April 16
  • May 23
  • June 12
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 19
  • February 4
  • March 10
  • April 36
  • May 24
  • June 18
  • July 18
  • August 20
  • September 19
  • October 27
  • November 26
  • December 15
2010 2011 2012
  • January 27
  • February 30
  • March 20
  • April 31
  • May 24
  • June 40
  • July 16
  • August 24
  • September 16
  • October 29
  • November 18
  • December 15
2009 2010 2011
  • January 52
  • February 18
  • March 36
  • April 24
  • May 51
  • June 20
  • July 25
  • August 23
  • September 13
  • October 5
  • November 15
  • December 19
2008 2009 2010
  • January 59
  • February 70
  • March 41
  • April 85
  • May 68
  • June 54
  • July 112
  • August 86
  • September 51
  • October 68
  • November 52
  • December 61
2007 2008 2009
  • January 52
  • February 40
  • March 18
  • April 62
  • May 71
  • June 110
  • July 31
  • August 48
  • September 45
  • October 63
  • November 148
  • December 64
2007 2008
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April 27
  • May 12
  • June 16
  • July 30
  • August 19
  • September 9
  • October 2
  • November
  • December 5